Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
AT dismissed the appeal challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, holding that the impugned properties constituted proceeds of crime derived from scheduled offences involving fraudulent loan obtainment. The Tribunal found the underlying decree was obtained ex parte, the bank suffered pecuniary loss, and a prima facie quid pro quo nexus existed through a contrived chain of transfers among interconnected accounts. Transfers to an intermediary and subsequent conveyance to the Appellant were held to be sham, with consideration routed back the same day, evidencing an attempt to disguise illicit receipts. Consequently the attachment was sustained as lawful and the appellate challenge unsustainable, and the appeal was dismissed.
AT dismissed the appeal challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, holding that the impugned properties constituted proceeds of crime derived from scheduled offences involving fraudulent loan obtainment. The Tribunal found the underlying decree was obtained ex parte, the bank suffered pecuniary loss, and a prima facie quid pro quo nexus existed through a contrived chain of transfers among interconnected accounts. Transfers to an intermediary and subsequent conveyance to the Appellant were held to be sham, with consideration routed back the same day, evidencing an attempt to disguise illicit receipts. Consequently the attachment was sustained as lawful and the appellate challenge unsustainable, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
