Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The HC held that, where the show-cause notice did not seek retrospective cancellation and the Petitioner failed to file any reply, the impugned order cannot operate retrospectively. Consequently, the cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration is declared effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN dated 9 October 2024. The CGST Department is granted liberty to initiate or continue proceedings in accordance with law, including seeking retrospective cancellation, if subsequent proceedings and materials justify such relief. The petition is disposed of accordingly, with no retrospective invalidation of the registration upheld on the present record.
The HC held that, where the show-cause notice did not seek retrospective cancellation and the Petitioner failed to file any reply, the impugned order cannot operate retrospectively. Consequently, the cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration is declared effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN dated 9 October 2024. The CGST Department is granted liberty to initiate or continue proceedings in accordance with law, including seeking retrospective cancellation, if subsequent proceedings and materials justify such relief. The petition is disposed of accordingly, with no retrospective invalidation of the registration upheld on the present record.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.