Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
The HC quashed the impugned Assessment Order dated 12.02.2025 and remitted the matter to the 2nd Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remittal is conditional: the Petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within thirty days of receipt of the order. The HC observed that similar relief had been granted previously under analogous circumstances and found no reason for a different approach. The petition is disposed of by way of remand, subject to compliance with the deposit condition, failing which the Respondent may proceed in accordance with law.
The HC quashed the impugned Assessment Order dated 12.02.2025 and remitted the matter to the 2nd Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remittal is conditional: the Petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within thirty days of receipt of the order. The HC observed that similar relief had been granted previously under analogous circumstances and found no reason for a different approach. The petition is disposed of by way of remand, subject to compliance with the deposit condition, failing which the Respondent may proceed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
