Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The court accepted that although an appeal had been initially rejected on limitation grounds, the validity of the underlying order was vitiated by non-inclusion of the DIN as required under the GST Act and related administrative instructions; consequently the impugned order is treated as invalid and requires fresh adjudication. The AO is directed to proceed afresh, ensuring statutory formalities (including DIN compliance) are observed and to decide the matter on merits within the statutory framework.
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The court accepted that although an appeal had been initially rejected on limitation grounds, the validity of the underlying order was vitiated by non-inclusion of the DIN as required under the GST Act and related administrative instructions; consequently the impugned order is treated as invalid and requires fresh adjudication. The AO is directed to proceed afresh, ensuring statutory formalities (including DIN compliance) are observed and to decide the matter on merits within the statutory framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
