Request-driven road restoration attracts reverse-charge GST, not governmental-function treatment or compensatory-damages status for business recipient...
Road restoration charges for commercial pipeline works are taxable Government services, with reverse charge liability and no public-function exemption...
Model-wise import cap monitoring cannot justify withholding used multifunction machines where all-India tracking is absent and full security is furnis...
The AT held that the penalty imposed on the Exchange is...
Penalty on exchange vacated for lack of evidence that exchange authorized subsidiaries' investments; Regulations 43(1) 2012 and 38(2) 2018 inapplicable
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The AT held that the penalty imposed on the Exchange is unsustainable and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal found no material demonstrating that the Exchange itself authorized investments or acquisitions by its subsidiaries; only the subsidiaries made the investments. Absent a board resolution or evidence attributing those acts to the Exchange, the Tribunal concluded that penal provisions must be construed strictly and that the impugned provisions do not permit imputation of a subsidiary's independent activities to its principal. Consequently, Regulation 43(1) of the 2012 Regulations and Regulation 38(2) of the 2018 Regulations were held inapplicable and the Regulatory authority's penalty was vacated.
The AT held that the penalty imposed on the Exchange is unsustainable and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal found no material demonstrating that the Exchange itself authorized investments or acquisitions by its subsidiaries; only the subsidiaries made the investments. Absent a board resolution or evidence attributing those acts to the Exchange, the Tribunal concluded that penal provisions must be construed strictly and that the impugned provisions do not permit imputation of a subsidiary's independent activities to its principal. Consequently, Regulation 43(1) of the 2012 Regulations and Regulation 38(2) of the 2018 Regulations were held inapplicable and the Regulatory authority's penalty was vacated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
