PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
ITAT upheld Revenue's classification of the agricultural land as...
Revenue classification: agricultural land treated as capital asset under s.2(14)(iii)(b); consideration fixed at Rs.1,00,44,000; s.54F exemption allowed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT upheld Revenue's classification of the agricultural land as a "capital asset" under s.2(14)(iii)(b) given its proximity to municipal limits and absence of cogent evidence from the assessee that the distance exceeded eight kilometres, and dismissed that ground. However, ITAT held AO erred in adopting Rs.2,50,00,000 as full value of consideration for 30.35 cents, finding the registered sale deed and books of account establish the consideration at Rs.1,00,44,000; the AO's addition of Rs.1,49,56,000 is deleted and LTCG is to be recomputed on Rs.1,00,44,000. The claim to distribute proceeds as ancestral property was rejected for lack of evidence. Exemption under s.54F was allowed for specified house-construction investments and LTCG to be recomputed accordingly.
ITAT upheld Revenue's classification of the agricultural land as a "capital asset" under s.2(14)(iii)(b) given its proximity to municipal limits and absence of cogent evidence from the assessee that the distance exceeded eight kilometres, and dismissed that ground. However, ITAT held AO erred in adopting Rs.2,50,00,000 as full value of consideration for 30.35 cents, finding the registered sale deed and books of account establish the consideration at Rs.1,00,44,000; the AO's addition of Rs.1,49,56,000 is deleted and LTCG is to be recomputed on Rs.1,00,44,000. The claim to distribute proceeds as ancestral property was rejected for lack of evidence. Exemption under s.54F was allowed for specified house-construction investments and LTCG to be recomputed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
