PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying...
Appeal allowed, exemption under section 11 restored for not-for-profit company under section 12A carrying out charitable activities including micro-finance
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying exemption under section 11, holding that the appellant-an entity registered as a not-for-profit under the Companies Act and under section 12A-carried out charitable activities including education, relief of poor, medical relief, environment and micro-finance. The Tribunal found the micro-finance receipts, though exceeding 20% of total receipts and comprising commission, processing fees and interest, to form part of the charitable objects and to have been historically treated as charitable receipts; it concluded that the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) erred, resulting in a miscarriage of justice, and directed restoration of exemption entitlement accordingly.
The ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying exemption under section 11, holding that the appellant-an entity registered as a not-for-profit under the Companies Act and under section 12A-carried out charitable activities including education, relief of poor, medical relief, environment and micro-finance. The Tribunal found the micro-finance receipts, though exceeding 20% of total receipts and comprising commission, processing fees and interest, to form part of the charitable objects and to have been historically treated as charitable receipts; it concluded that the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) erred, resulting in a miscarriage of justice, and directed restoration of exemption entitlement accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.