Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC dismissed the writ petition as premature and granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Government Circular dated 11.07.2024; the petitioner is directed to furnish the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act and the requisite undertaking/affidavit within two weeks. Upon such compliance and on filing the undertaking that an appeal will be prosecuted when the Appellate Tribunal is constituted, recovery of the balance confirmed demand shall remain stayed under Section 112(9) of the CGST Act. The respondents raised no objection to this route and the petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC dismissed the writ petition as premature and granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Government Circular dated 11.07.2024; the petitioner is directed to furnish the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act and the requisite undertaking/affidavit within two weeks. Upon such compliance and on filing the undertaking that an appeal will be prosecuted when the Appellate Tribunal is constituted, recovery of the balance confirmed demand shall remain stayed under Section 112(9) of the CGST Act. The respondents raised no objection to this route and the petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
