Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective...
Retrospective GST registration cancellation set aside; authority must allow reply and reconsideration, petitioner permitted to respond by 15 October 2025
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, finding that retrospective cancellation is unsustainable where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect and principles of natural justice were infringed by the petitioner's failure to file a reply and to avail personal hearing. The court reiterated its established view that retrospective withdrawal of registration cannot be upheld absent explicit notice. The matter is remitted for reconsideration: the petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the SCN by 15 October 2025, after which the authority shall proceed in accordance with law. Petition allowed and impugned order dated 22 November 2024 set aside.
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, finding that retrospective cancellation is unsustainable where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect and principles of natural justice were infringed by the petitioner's failure to file a reply and to avail personal hearing. The court reiterated its established view that retrospective withdrawal of registration cannot be upheld absent explicit notice. The matter is remitted for reconsideration: the petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the SCN by 15 October 2025, after which the authority shall proceed in accordance with law. Petition allowed and impugned order dated 22 November 2024 set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
