Transfer-pricing reimbursement adjustments require uncontrolled comparables and cannot become expense-genuineness reviews, resulting in deletion of th...
Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Customs Broker licensing proceedings fail when their offence-report foundation collapses and authorisation, advisory, and KYC duties remain unbreached...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC modified the stay conditions relating to an ex parte faceless assessment order which fixed taxable income at an amount vastly exceeding the assessee's reported earnings and where Revenue had seized bank accounts and immovable property. The court found the earlier requirement-payment of Rs.5 lakh per month until 20% of the demand was discharged-unduly onerous and substituted an interim regime: the assessee must pay Rs.1,00,000 per month until either 5% of the outstanding demand is paid or the appellate authority decides the appeal, whichever occurs earlier. The HC directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal expeditiously, preferably within four months of receipt of certified copy, and restrained the assessee from alienating or mortgaging immovable property without prior written permission of the jurisdictional AO.
The HC modified the stay conditions relating to an ex parte faceless assessment order which fixed taxable income at an amount vastly exceeding the assessee's reported earnings and where Revenue had seized bank accounts and immovable property. The court found the earlier requirement-payment of Rs.5 lakh per month until 20% of the demand was discharged-unduly onerous and substituted an interim regime: the assessee must pay Rs.1,00,000 per month until either 5% of the outstanding demand is paid or the appellate authority decides the appeal, whichever occurs earlier. The HC directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal expeditiously, preferably within four months of receipt of certified copy, and restrained the assessee from alienating or mortgaging immovable property without prior written permission of the jurisdictional AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
