Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment....
Appeal dismissed; provisional attachment of equivalent-value immovable property upheld where accused's cash deposits unexplained and funds routed through joint accounts
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment. The Tribunal held that where alleged proceeds have vanished or are not recoverable from the accused, immovable property of equivalent value may be provisionally attached; the impugned order reflects attachment for equivalent value, not a declaration that the property itself constitutes direct proceeds. The appellant failed to disclose the source of funds, evidence showed cash deposits by the appellant's father were routed through joint and appellant accounts to effect payment, and the cash source remained unexplained. No ground for interference was found with the attachment order, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed.
AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment. The Tribunal held that where alleged proceeds have vanished or are not recoverable from the accused, immovable property of equivalent value may be provisionally attached; the impugned order reflects attachment for equivalent value, not a declaration that the property itself constitutes direct proceeds. The appellant failed to disclose the source of funds, evidence showed cash deposits by the appellant's father were routed through joint and appellant accounts to effect payment, and the cash source remained unexplained. No ground for interference was found with the attachment order, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
