PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
ITAT held that for AY 2018-19 the appellate authority (CIT(A)) lacked power under s.251(1) to set aside the assessment to the AO for de novo computation because the proviso empowering such reference took effect from 01.10.2024; accordingly the CIT(A)'s direction to verify expenditure and remit computation to the AO was unauthorized and was quashed, with instruction that CIT(A) exercise only statutory powers to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment. On claim of parity between ss.12A and 10(23C), ITAT concluded no legislative intent to extend the proviso's benefit to s.10(23C); consequently the CIT(A)'s disallowance of s.10(23C) relief for AY 2018-19 was upheld and the assessee's cross-objection dismissed.
ITAT held that for AY 2018-19 the appellate authority (CIT(A)) lacked power under s.251(1) to set aside the assessment to the AO for de novo computation because the proviso empowering such reference took effect from 01.10.2024; accordingly the CIT(A)'s direction to verify expenditure and remit computation to the AO was unauthorized and was quashed, with instruction that CIT(A) exercise only statutory powers to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment. On claim of parity between ss.12A and 10(23C), ITAT concluded no legislative intent to extend the proviso's benefit to s.10(23C); consequently the CIT(A)'s disallowance of s.10(23C) relief for AY 2018-19 was upheld and the assessee's cross-objection dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
