Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal by the Resolution Professional (RP), holding the RP's appeal was maintainable given adverse observations by the Adjudicating Authority (AA) that impugned the RP's exercise of powers. The Tribunal held the RP is statutorily obliged under CIRP Regulations (Reg.13) to verify all claims as at the insolvency commencement date and that verification is a ministerial/statutory function, not adjudication. The AA's adverse findings that verification constituted excess or abuse of power were ordered deleted, including directions to forward the order to IBBI. However, the AA's direction to the RP to reconsider and decide on the anonymized respondent's claim was sustained; the RP must re-examine and determine the claim. Appeal dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal by the Resolution Professional (RP), holding the RP's appeal was maintainable given adverse observations by the Adjudicating Authority (AA) that impugned the RP's exercise of powers. The Tribunal held the RP is statutorily obliged under CIRP Regulations (Reg.13) to verify all claims as at the insolvency commencement date and that verification is a ministerial/statutory function, not adjudication. The AA's adverse findings that verification constituted excess or abuse of power were ordered deleted, including directions to forward the order to IBBI. However, the AA's direction to the RP to reconsider and decide on the anonymized respondent's claim was sustained; the RP must re-examine and determine the claim. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
