Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration for noncompliance with Rule 10A CGST Rules and for lack of a reasoned order under Section 29(2), holding that retrospective revocation requires a show-cause notice contemplating such effect and a reasoned application of mind. The court directed that the cancellation shall be effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN, namely 6 August 2024, while permitting the revenue to initiate further proceedings if it intends to pursue retrospective cancellation in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of.
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration for noncompliance with Rule 10A CGST Rules and for lack of a reasoned order under Section 29(2), holding that retrospective revocation requires a show-cause notice contemplating such effect and a reasoned application of mind. The court directed that the cancellation shall be effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN, namely 6 August 2024, while permitting the revenue to initiate further proceedings if it intends to pursue retrospective cancellation in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.