Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC held that initiation of proceedings under section 130 read with section 122 of the GST Act based on excess stock found during a survey was improper. The Court reaffirmed that section 130 proceedings are not applicable for cases involving excess stock discrepancies, which must be addressed under sections 73 or 74 of the GST Act. Reliance was placed on precedent establishing that excess stock discovered during a survey cannot trigger section 130 proceedings. Consequently, the impugned orders initiating action under section 130 were quashed, and the petition was allowed, directing the authorities to proceed under the appropriate provisions for tax recovery and assessment.
The HC held that initiation of proceedings under section 130 read with section 122 of the GST Act based on excess stock found during a survey was improper. The Court reaffirmed that section 130 proceedings are not applicable for cases involving excess stock discrepancies, which must be addressed under sections 73 or 74 of the GST Act. Reliance was placed on precedent establishing that excess stock discovered during a survey cannot trigger section 130 proceedings. Consequently, the impugned orders initiating action under section 130 were quashed, and the petition was allowed, directing the authorities to proceed under the appropriate provisions for tax recovery and assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
