Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The HC dismissed the writ petitions filed by the petitioner challenging the demand for wrongful availment of ineligible ITC, interest, and penalty arising from discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns. The petitioner, who voluntarily provided OTP access to a third party, facilitated the creation of multiple fraudulent GST registrations resulting in ITC claims exceeding Rs. 50 crores. The Court held that the petitioner cannot claim innocence given these facts and declined to conduct a factual inquiry into the misuse of ITC, directing that such investigations fall within the purview of police authorities. Consequently, the petitions were disposed of, upholding the impugned orders and affirming the demand for recovery of tax liabilities and associated penalties.
The HC dismissed the writ petitions filed by the petitioner challenging the demand for wrongful availment of ineligible ITC, interest, and penalty arising from discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns. The petitioner, who voluntarily provided OTP access to a third party, facilitated the creation of multiple fraudulent GST registrations resulting in ITC claims exceeding Rs. 50 crores. The Court held that the petitioner cannot claim innocence given these facts and declined to conduct a factual inquiry into the misuse of ITC, directing that such investigations fall within the purview of police authorities. Consequently, the petitions were disposed of, upholding the impugned orders and affirming the demand for recovery of tax liabilities and associated penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
