Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The ITAT held that the comparable company selected by the TPO for transfer pricing adjustment did not match the functional profile of the assessee and thus must be excluded from the comparable set. Regarding other comparables, the tribunal directed the AO/TPO to reconsider their inclusion afresh, applying appropriate filters and providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard and submit supporting documents. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter for further examination consistent with the directions.
The ITAT held that the comparable company selected by the TPO for transfer pricing adjustment did not match the functional profile of the assessee and thus must be excluded from the comparable set. Regarding other comparables, the tribunal directed the AO/TPO to reconsider their inclusion afresh, applying appropriate filters and providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard and submit supporting documents. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter for further examination consistent with the directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.