Separate business unit compliance for non-SEBI-regulated debenture trustee activities receives an extended implementation timeline amid regulatory rev...
Input Service Distributor credit rules assign eligibility, reversals and refund treatment to recipients while excluding transfer invoices from turnove...
Related-party creditor exclusion bars CoC participation where lender rights show policy-making involvement, and post-CIRP assignment cannot cure ineli...
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal by reducing the disallowance of improvement costs from Rs. 32,98,799 to Rs. 10,00,000. The tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence regarding construction expenses on the capital asset, despite minor discrepancies in the property address. It was held that the expenditure was legitimately incurred on the plot(s) in question, and the department failed to justify the entire disallowance. The relief granted amounted to Rs. 22,98,799, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The order clarified that this decision shall not serve as precedent in other cases.
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal by reducing the disallowance of improvement costs from Rs. 32,98,799 to Rs. 10,00,000. The tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence regarding construction expenses on the capital asset, despite minor discrepancies in the property address. It was held that the expenditure was legitimately incurred on the plot(s) in question, and the department failed to justify the entire disallowance. The relief granted amounted to Rs. 22,98,799, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The order clarified that this decision shall not serve as precedent in other cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.