Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC granted regular bail to the petitioners charged under Section 132 of the CGST Act, rejecting the denial of bail solely due to pending investigation against co-accused. The Court emphasized that bail decisions must be individualized, considering the accused's specific role, nature of accusations, evidence, and other relevant factors. The petitioners demonstrated clean antecedents, cooperation with the investigation, and the evidence primarily consisted of documentary and electronic material already with the agency. Consequently, the petitioners were ordered released on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court, subject to compliance with imposed conditions. The ruling reaffirmed that bail cannot be withheld merely because investigations continue against others implicated in the same complaint.
The HC granted regular bail to the petitioners charged under Section 132 of the CGST Act, rejecting the denial of bail solely due to pending investigation against co-accused. The Court emphasized that bail decisions must be individualized, considering the accused's specific role, nature of accusations, evidence, and other relevant factors. The petitioners demonstrated clean antecedents, cooperation with the investigation, and the evidence primarily consisted of documentary and electronic material already with the agency. Consequently, the petitioners were ordered released on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court, subject to compliance with imposed conditions. The ruling reaffirmed that bail cannot be withheld merely because investigations continue against others implicated in the same complaint.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
