Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The DSC dismissed the bail application of the accused, a key partner of the manufacturing firm, arrested under Section 69 of the CGST Act for clandestine supply of goods without invoicing and fraudulent availing of ITC. Investigation revealed extensive cash transactions amounting to approximately Rs. 70 crore, misuse of input tax credit exceeding Rs. 9.32 crore, and GST evasion of Rs. 57.82 lakh. The accused confessed to the offences, including receipt of cash payments and payment of commission for fraudulent invoices. Given the absence of a charge sheet, the likelihood of evidence tampering, witness influence, and risk of flight, the court found bail inappropriate. Considering the gravity of the economic offences and established legal principles, the accused was denied bail to prevent obstruction of justice and ensure accountability.
The DSC dismissed the bail application of the accused, a key partner of the manufacturing firm, arrested under Section 69 of the CGST Act for clandestine supply of goods without invoicing and fraudulent availing of ITC. Investigation revealed extensive cash transactions amounting to approximately Rs. 70 crore, misuse of input tax credit exceeding Rs. 9.32 crore, and GST evasion of Rs. 57.82 lakh. The accused confessed to the offences, including receipt of cash payments and payment of commission for fraudulent invoices. Given the absence of a charge sheet, the likelihood of evidence tampering, witness influence, and risk of flight, the court found bail inappropriate. Considering the gravity of the economic offences and established legal principles, the accused was denied bail to prevent obstruction of justice and ensure accountability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
