Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The DSC dismissed the bail application of the accused, a key partner of the manufacturing firm, arrested under Section 69 of the CGST Act for clandestine supply of goods without invoicing and fraudulent availing of ITC. Investigation revealed extensive cash transactions amounting to approximately Rs. 70 crore, misuse of input tax credit exceeding Rs. 9.32 crore, and GST evasion of Rs. 57.82 lakh. The accused confessed to the offences, including receipt of cash payments and payment of commission for fraudulent invoices. Given the absence of a charge sheet, the likelihood of evidence tampering, witness influence, and risk of flight, the court found bail inappropriate. Considering the gravity of the economic offences and established legal principles, the accused was denied bail to prevent obstruction of justice and ensure accountability.
The DSC dismissed the bail application of the accused, a key partner of the manufacturing firm, arrested under Section 69 of the CGST Act for clandestine supply of goods without invoicing and fraudulent availing of ITC. Investigation revealed extensive cash transactions amounting to approximately Rs. 70 crore, misuse of input tax credit exceeding Rs. 9.32 crore, and GST evasion of Rs. 57.82 lakh. The accused confessed to the offences, including receipt of cash payments and payment of commission for fraudulent invoices. Given the absence of a charge sheet, the likelihood of evidence tampering, witness influence, and risk of flight, the court found bail inappropriate. Considering the gravity of the economic offences and established legal principles, the accused was denied bail to prevent obstruction of justice and ensure accountability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
