Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the applicability of the refund formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST/SGST Rules, 2017 and related notifications. The Court upheld the validity of the formula for refund of unutilized input tax credit, rejecting claims of ambiguity or unworkability. It affirmed the High Court's view that although the formula may produce certain practical inequities, it aligns with legislative intent to grant limited refunds on accumulated ITC. The Court declined to interfere, holding that the GST Council's formula and related circulars are valid and their retrospective or prospective application does not warrant judicial intervention. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, confirming the existing legal framework for refund of unutilized ITC under the prescribed rules.
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the applicability of the refund formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST/SGST Rules, 2017 and related notifications. The Court upheld the validity of the formula for refund of unutilized input tax credit, rejecting claims of ambiguity or unworkability. It affirmed the High Court's view that although the formula may produce certain practical inequities, it aligns with legislative intent to grant limited refunds on accumulated ITC. The Court declined to interfere, holding that the GST Council's formula and related circulars are valid and their retrospective or prospective application does not warrant judicial intervention. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, confirming the existing legal framework for refund of unutilized ITC under the prescribed rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
