Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The HC held that the absence of a DIN on the assessment order, a fundamental issue affecting its validity, was not addressed in the impugned ITAT orders. This omission goes to the root of the assessment's legality and must be considered during appeal disposal. The HC quashed and set aside the common ITAT order and remanded the appeals for fresh adjudication. The ITAT, as the final fact-finding authority, was directed to hear the parties anew, allowing them to introduce any additional evidence, grounds, or contentions in support of their respective appeals or cross-objections.
The HC held that the absence of a DIN on the assessment order, a fundamental issue affecting its validity, was not addressed in the impugned ITAT orders. This omission goes to the root of the assessment's legality and must be considered during appeal disposal. The HC quashed and set aside the common ITAT order and remanded the appeals for fresh adjudication. The ITAT, as the final fact-finding authority, was directed to hear the parties anew, allowing them to introduce any additional evidence, grounds, or contentions in support of their respective appeals or cross-objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.