Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal concerning bogus accommodation sales bill entries. The Tribunal held that, given the beneficiary of the accommodation entries was identified based on the survey, the commission rate on such entries should be fixed at 5%, aligning with precedent. The Assessing Officer's application of a 10% commission rate lacked justification, and the Commissioner's order was accordingly set aside to the extent of the commission rate. The AO was directed to apply a 5% commission on the accommodation entries instead of 10%. The Department's stand supporting the 10% rate was rejected, and the appeal was allowed in part.
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal concerning bogus accommodation sales bill entries. The Tribunal held that, given the beneficiary of the accommodation entries was identified based on the survey, the commission rate on such entries should be fixed at 5%, aligning with precedent. The Assessing Officer's application of a 10% commission rate lacked justification, and the Commissioner's order was accordingly set aside to the extent of the commission rate. The AO was directed to apply a 5% commission on the accommodation entries instead of 10%. The Department's stand supporting the 10% rate was rejected, and the appeal was allowed in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
