Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payment of Rs. 30 lakhs towards property purchase. It was held that the genuineness and bona fide nature of the transaction, including the cash payment, could not be doubted. The tribunal relied on precedent affirming that Section 40A(3) is not absolute and permits consideration of business expediency and relevant facts. The payment was made at the seller's insistence, constituting legitimate business expediency. Consequently, the cash payment did not violate Section 40A(3), and the disallowance was unwarranted in the circumstances.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payment of Rs. 30 lakhs towards property purchase. It was held that the genuineness and bona fide nature of the transaction, including the cash payment, could not be doubted. The tribunal relied on precedent affirming that Section 40A(3) is not absolute and permits consideration of business expediency and relevant facts. The payment was made at the seller's insistence, constituting legitimate business expediency. Consequently, the cash payment did not violate Section 40A(3), and the disallowance was unwarranted in the circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.