Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The DSC granted anticipatory bail to the applicant accused, a partner of M/s Essar Impex LLP, in a case involving alleged under-valuation of imported inshell walnuts to evade customs duty. The court noted that the summons issued pertained to tendering oral evidence and acknowledged the applicant's advanced age and medical condition supported by recent documentation. While recognizing the seriousness of the offence and potential risks of witness tampering, the court balanced the need for a fair investigation against preventing harassment and unjustified detention. On evaluating the material, the court found no necessity for the applicant's custodial presence at this stage. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was allowed, ensuring the accused's protection from arrest without impeding the investigatory process.
The DSC granted anticipatory bail to the applicant accused, a partner of M/s Essar Impex LLP, in a case involving alleged under-valuation of imported inshell walnuts to evade customs duty. The court noted that the summons issued pertained to tendering oral evidence and acknowledged the applicant's advanced age and medical condition supported by recent documentation. While recognizing the seriousness of the offence and potential risks of witness tampering, the court balanced the need for a fair investigation against preventing harassment and unjustified detention. On evaluating the material, the court found no necessity for the applicant's custodial presence at this stage. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was allowed, ensuring the accused's protection from arrest without impeding the investigatory process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.