Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the trial court's acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds. The appellant's demand notice was duly issued within the statutory limitation period as prescribed under proviso (b) of Section 138, evidenced by receipt dated 2.11.1993, and no credible evidence was presented by the respondent to dispute the authenticity or service of the notice. The trial court erred in calculating the limitation from the date of receipt of the demand notice instead of from the date of dishonour information. Consequently, the respondent was convicted for the offence under Section 138 NI Act, and the appeal was allowed.
The HC set aside the trial court's acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds. The appellant's demand notice was duly issued within the statutory limitation period as prescribed under proviso (b) of Section 138, evidenced by receipt dated 2.11.1993, and no credible evidence was presented by the respondent to dispute the authenticity or service of the notice. The trial court erred in calculating the limitation from the date of receipt of the demand notice instead of from the date of dishonour information. Consequently, the respondent was convicted for the offence under Section 138 NI Act, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.