Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the relevant assessment year, rejecting the assessee's contention that the allowability determined for a prior year should apply by res judicata. The Tribunal affirmed that principles of res judicata do not apply across different assessment years, as each year is a separate unit of assessment subject to independent scrutiny. The assessee's claim based on a purported timely completion certificate was found to be incorrect, and since the certificate was issued beyond the prescribed completion period, the deduction was rightly denied. The decision of the CIT(Appeals) was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the relevant assessment year, rejecting the assessee's contention that the allowability determined for a prior year should apply by res judicata. The Tribunal affirmed that principles of res judicata do not apply across different assessment years, as each year is a separate unit of assessment subject to independent scrutiny. The assessee's claim based on a purported timely completion certificate was found to be incorrect, and since the certificate was issued beyond the prescribed completion period, the deduction was rightly denied. The decision of the CIT(Appeals) was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.