Request-driven road restoration attracts reverse-charge GST, not governmental-function treatment or compensatory-damages status for business recipient...
Road restoration charges for commercial pipeline works are taxable Government services, with reverse charge liability and no public-function exemption...
Model-wise import cap monitoring cannot justify withholding used multifunction machines where all-India tracking is absent and full security is furnis...
The HC dismissed the suit seeking a declaration that the plaintiff bank was discharged from its obligations under unconditional and irrevocable bank guarantees (BGs) issued in favor of the respondent. The court held that the BGs constituted independent contracts guaranteeing due repayment upon mere demand, regardless of disputes between the principal debtor and beneficiary. The plaintiff failed to establish any variation or discharge of the principal debtor's liability, including the unilateral alteration of payment methodology, which was not a contractual term. Consequently, the plaintiff remained liable under the BGs. The court distinguished prior rulings where the principal debtor was discharged, thereby releasing the surety, noting such was not the case here. The plaintiff was granted liberty to pursue its claims against the principal debtor through insolvency proceedings or other legal remedies.
The HC dismissed the suit seeking a declaration that the plaintiff bank was discharged from its obligations under unconditional and irrevocable bank guarantees (BGs) issued in favor of the respondent. The court held that the BGs constituted independent contracts guaranteeing due repayment upon mere demand, regardless of disputes between the principal debtor and beneficiary. The plaintiff failed to establish any variation or discharge of the principal debtor's liability, including the unilateral alteration of payment methodology, which was not a contractual term. Consequently, the plaintiff remained liable under the BGs. The court distinguished prior rulings where the principal debtor was discharged, thereby releasing the surety, noting such was not the case here. The plaintiff was granted liberty to pursue its claims against the principal debtor through insolvency proceedings or other legal remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.