Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) lacked jurisdiction to enhance the assessment under section 251 due to failure to issue the mandatory enhancement notice under section 251(2). The addition based on net profit at 8% of turnover was deleted as the assessee was not afforded an opportunity to respond to the enhancement proposal, rendering the addition invalid. Consequently, the addition relating to net profit was set aside, and the assessee's grounds were allowed.
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) lacked jurisdiction to enhance the assessment under section 251 due to failure to issue the mandatory enhancement notice under section 251(2). The addition based on net profit at 8% of turnover was deleted as the assessee was not afforded an opportunity to respond to the enhancement proposal, rendering the addition invalid. Consequently, the addition relating to net profit was set aside, and the assessee's grounds were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.