Restricted silver imports may clear under a valid import authorisation without additional status or exchange-routing requirements unless expressly imp...
Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under section 271DA of the Act due to the absence of recorded satisfaction in the quantum assessment order, a mandatory prerequisite for levying such penalty. Drawing analogy from the Supreme Court's ruling in a case concerning section 271E, where penalties were quashed for lack of recorded satisfaction, the tribunal held that the same principle applies to penalties under section 271DA. Consequently, the penalty imposed without the requisite satisfaction recording was held invalid. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the penalty under section 271DA was cancelled.
The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under section 271DA of the Act due to the absence of recorded satisfaction in the quantum assessment order, a mandatory prerequisite for levying such penalty. Drawing analogy from the Supreme Court's ruling in a case concerning section 271E, where penalties were quashed for lack of recorded satisfaction, the tribunal held that the same principle applies to penalties under section 271DA. Consequently, the penalty imposed without the requisite satisfaction recording was held invalid. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the penalty under section 271DA was cancelled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.