Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside the assessment framed under section 153C, holding that the combined satisfaction note issued by the AO for multiple assessment years was invalid. The AO initiated proceedings based on documents seized during a search in a third-party case, but the issuance of a consolidated satisfaction note for different years contravened the statutory requirement to record separate satisfaction notes for each assessment year. Consequently, the CIT(A) rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 2,11,00,000, and the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing the assessment proceedings initiated on the basis of the flawed combined satisfaction note.
The ITAT set aside the assessment framed under section 153C, holding that the combined satisfaction note issued by the AO for multiple assessment years was invalid. The AO initiated proceedings based on documents seized during a search in a third-party case, but the issuance of a consolidated satisfaction note for different years contravened the statutory requirement to record separate satisfaction notes for each assessment year. Consequently, the CIT(A) rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 2,11,00,000, and the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing the assessment proceedings initiated on the basis of the flawed combined satisfaction note.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.