Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
The HC upheld the dismissal of the appeal filed three years and twenty days beyond the prescribed limitation period, affirming that the appellate authority's power to condone delay is strictly limited to thirty days. The court relied on established precedents interpreting analogous statutory provisions, emphasizing that no residual discretion exists to extend limitation beyond the specified period under the relevant Acts. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the order was dismissed, reinforcing the principle that courts and tribunals cannot entertain appeals filed beyond the statutory time frame except within narrowly prescribed limits.
The HC upheld the dismissal of the appeal filed three years and twenty days beyond the prescribed limitation period, affirming that the appellate authority's power to condone delay is strictly limited to thirty days. The court relied on established precedents interpreting analogous statutory provisions, emphasizing that no residual discretion exists to extend limitation beyond the specified period under the relevant Acts. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the order was dismissed, reinforcing the principle that courts and tribunals cannot entertain appeals filed beyond the statutory time frame except within narrowly prescribed limits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
