Electronic certificates of origin enable preferential tariffs under the India-New Zealand FTA when format, verification, and filing requirements are m...
Customs approval for liquid cargo exports extends designated jetty operations while existing boarding station and customs area limits remain unchanged...
Mandatory compliance document verification now conditions out-of-charge clearance for imported cosmetics, drugs, and medical devices through PGA-facil...
Page of 4923
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98454 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unsustainable where the assessee voluntarily disclosed additional income in returns filed under section 148 during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal observed absence of incriminating evidence or suppression, acceptance of revised returns by the AO without adverse inference, and reliance on precedents affirming that mere surrender of income or disallowance without concealment does not attract penalty. Furthermore, the AO failed to record satisfaction under either limb of section 271(1)(c), rendering the penalty proceedings invalid. Consequently, the penalty imposed for all five assessment years was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
The ITAT held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unsustainable where the assessee voluntarily disclosed additional income in returns filed under section 148 during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal observed absence of incriminating evidence or suppression, acceptance of revised returns by the AO without adverse inference, and reliance on precedents affirming that mere surrender of income or disallowance without concealment does not attract penalty. Furthermore, the AO failed to record satisfaction under either limb of section 271(1)(c), rendering the penalty proceedings invalid. Consequently, the penalty imposed for all five assessment years was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.