Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC allowed the petitioner to rectify the mistake under section 154 by filing the income tax return in the name of her deceased husband as his legal representative under section 159 for AY 2014-15, thereby claiming the TDS credit on his salary income. The CPC was directed to process the return expeditiously without raising limitation objections, and the limitation for filing the return was waived. The court recognized that failure to adjust the TDS against the late husband's tax liability would result in unjust enrichment of the Revenue. The petition was disposed of accordingly, and the notice was discharged.
The HC allowed the petitioner to rectify the mistake under section 154 by filing the income tax return in the name of her deceased husband as his legal representative under section 159 for AY 2014-15, thereby claiming the TDS credit on his salary income. The CPC was directed to process the return expeditiously without raising limitation objections, and the limitation for filing the return was waived. The court recognized that failure to adjust the TDS against the late husband's tax liability would result in unjust enrichment of the Revenue. The petition was disposed of accordingly, and the notice was discharged.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.