Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT held that interest paid under Section 50(3) of the GST Act is compensatory, not penal, and thus deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance of such interest by the AO and CIT(A) was set aside. Regarding disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) for interest on advances, the Tribunal found no established nexus between borrowed funds and interest-free advances, relying on the presumption that advances were made from interest-free funds supported by financial statements. The AO's reliance on statements without proper fund tracing was insufficient. Consequently, the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) was also deleted.
The ITAT held that interest paid under Section 50(3) of the GST Act is compensatory, not penal, and thus deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance of such interest by the AO and CIT(A) was set aside. Regarding disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) for interest on advances, the Tribunal found no established nexus between borrowed funds and interest-free advances, relying on the presumption that advances were made from interest-free funds supported by financial statements. The AO's reliance on statements without proper fund tracing was insufficient. Consequently, the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) was also deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
