Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC upheld the CESTAT's determination affirming the appellant's entitlement to the exemption under Notification No. 50/2017-Customs for parts/components imported for the manufacture of Lithium Ion Batteries. Despite the appellant producing power banks from these batteries, the Court found that the raw materials were rightly used in the manufacture of Lithium Ion Batteries which were subsequently utilized in power bank production. The claim for exemption was therefore valid. The appellant's contention regarding the extended period of limitation was not accepted. The SC found no merit to disturb the impugned order and dismissed the appeals accordingly.
The SC upheld the CESTAT's determination affirming the appellant's entitlement to the exemption under Notification No. 50/2017-Customs for parts/components imported for the manufacture of Lithium Ion Batteries. Despite the appellant producing power banks from these batteries, the Court found that the raw materials were rightly used in the manufacture of Lithium Ion Batteries which were subsequently utilized in power bank production. The claim for exemption was therefore valid. The appellant's contention regarding the extended period of limitation was not accepted. The SC found no merit to disturb the impugned order and dismissed the appeals accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
