Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the revision under section 263, holding that the PCIT erred in disallowing the deduction of tax on provisional expenses, as these provisions complied with the Mercantile System of Accounting mandated by the Income Tax Act and Companies Act. The tribunal noted that the provisions were reversed on the first day of the subsequent financial year, negating any tax deduction failure. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the depreciation claim on an intangible asset with a nil acquisition cost, ruling that the TDS paid on the premium became part of the block of assets and could not be separately disallowed. Consequently, the AO's disallowance of depreciation was quashed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT set aside the revision under section 263, holding that the PCIT erred in disallowing the deduction of tax on provisional expenses, as these provisions complied with the Mercantile System of Accounting mandated by the Income Tax Act and Companies Act. The tribunal noted that the provisions were reversed on the first day of the subsequent financial year, negating any tax deduction failure. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the depreciation claim on an intangible asset with a nil acquisition cost, ruling that the TDS paid on the premium became part of the block of assets and could not be separately disallowed. Consequently, the AO's disallowance of depreciation was quashed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.