Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
The HC directed the respondents to unblock the petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) previously blocked under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules. The Court held that the restriction under Rule 86A(3) ceases upon the petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax amount and filing an appeal within the statutory period prescribed under Section 107 of the TNGST Act. Failure to file the appeal within this period would authorize the respondents to re-block the unutilized ITC. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with a mandate to unblock the ITC amounts blocked on specific dates, subject to the petitioner meeting the deposit and appeal conditions.
The HC directed the respondents to unblock the petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) previously blocked under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules. The Court held that the restriction under Rule 86A(3) ceases upon the petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax amount and filing an appeal within the statutory period prescribed under Section 107 of the TNGST Act. Failure to file the appeal within this period would authorize the respondents to re-block the unutilized ITC. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with a mandate to unblock the ITC amounts blocked on specific dates, subject to the petitioner meeting the deposit and appeal conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
