COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the provisions of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) do not apply where the assessee, not being a beneficial or registered shareholder, received loans from sister concerns in which the holding company has substantial interest. Both limbs of the section were found inapplicable as there was no evidence of funds being transferred to the holding company. Consequently, the addition under section 2(22)(e) was deleted. Regarding the addition under section 68 for an unsecured loan from a related party, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence of genuineness and creditworthiness, including group affiliations, consistent bookkeeping, confirmation, and a favorable arbitration award. The AO's observations were insufficient to disprove the transaction's bona fides. The Tribunal affirmed the genuineness without remitting the matter, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing deletion of the impugned additions.
The ITAT held that the provisions of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) do not apply where the assessee, not being a beneficial or registered shareholder, received loans from sister concerns in which the holding company has substantial interest. Both limbs of the section were found inapplicable as there was no evidence of funds being transferred to the holding company. Consequently, the addition under section 2(22)(e) was deleted. Regarding the addition under section 68 for an unsecured loan from a related party, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence of genuineness and creditworthiness, including group affiliations, consistent bookkeeping, confirmation, and a favorable arbitration award. The AO's observations were insufficient to disprove the transaction's bona fides. The Tribunal affirmed the genuineness without remitting the matter, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing deletion of the impugned additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
