Limitation in customs appeals permits exclusion for bona fide refund proceedings, enabling restoration of Bill of Entry assessment challenges on merit...
Warehousing permission requires deposit at the designated bonded warehouse; unauthorised diversion triggers confiscation, redemption fine and importer...
The HC held that the petition challenging the impugned order involving large-scale fraudulent availing and passing off of Input Tax Credit (ITC) through misuse of provisional GST numbers was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The Court emphasized that an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, constitutes a comprehensive remedy and must be pursued. Despite the limitation period having lapsed, the Petitioner was granted a one-month extension to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. The matter was adjourned for further hearing accordingly.
The HC held that the petition challenging the impugned order involving large-scale fraudulent availing and passing off of Input Tax Credit (ITC) through misuse of provisional GST numbers was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The Court emphasized that an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, constitutes a comprehensive remedy and must be pursued. Despite the limitation period having lapsed, the Petitioner was granted a one-month extension to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. The matter was adjourned for further hearing accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
