Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC held that the petition challenging the impugned order involving large-scale fraudulent availing and passing off of Input Tax Credit (ITC) through misuse of provisional GST numbers was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The Court emphasized that an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, constitutes a comprehensive remedy and must be pursued. Despite the limitation period having lapsed, the Petitioner was granted a one-month extension to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. The matter was adjourned for further hearing accordingly.
The HC held that the petition challenging the impugned order involving large-scale fraudulent availing and passing off of Input Tax Credit (ITC) through misuse of provisional GST numbers was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The Court emphasized that an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, constitutes a comprehensive remedy and must be pursued. Despite the limitation period having lapsed, the Petitioner was granted a one-month extension to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. The matter was adjourned for further hearing accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
