Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC found that the first respondent violated the principles of natural justice by passing the impugned order without granting the petitioner the mandatory third personal hearing as required under the relevant provisions. The petitioner had submitted a reply and requested an opportunity for a third hearing and to produce records, which was not afforded. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the first respondent with a direction to provide the petitioner a personal hearing on 24-12-2024. The first respondent is to consider the petitioner's submissions and documents and pass a reasoned order on merits in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC found that the first respondent violated the principles of natural justice by passing the impugned order without granting the petitioner the mandatory third personal hearing as required under the relevant provisions. The petitioner had submitted a reply and requested an opportunity for a third hearing and to produce records, which was not afforded. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the first respondent with a direction to provide the petitioner a personal hearing on 24-12-2024. The first respondent is to consider the petitioner's submissions and documents and pass a reasoned order on merits in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
