CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Charitable registration turns on predominant purpose and genuine activities, while incidental fees and related-party rent require supporting adverse m...
MAT book-profit adjustments exclude disallowances for exempt-income expenditure and demerger expenditure unless expressly listed under the statutory c...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT reversed the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the AO's disallowance, directing allowance of deductions under sections 80P(2)(d) and 80P(2)(iv) of the Act. It held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for dividend and interest income from investments in cooperative societies is permissible on the gross amount, not net, distinguishing prior case law concerning business profits. The claim for deduction on profits from seed sales under section 80P(2)(iv) was upheld as per earlier ITAT decisions, allowing a 20% attribution of indirect expenses. Regarding section 14A read with Rule 8D disallowance for expenses incurred to earn exempt income, the tribunal ruled that such provisions do not apply to expenses related to income deductible under Chapter VIA. Consequently, the ITAT ruled entirely in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to grant the claimed deductions and delete the section 14A disallowance.
The ITAT reversed the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the AO's disallowance, directing allowance of deductions under sections 80P(2)(d) and 80P(2)(iv) of the Act. It held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for dividend and interest income from investments in cooperative societies is permissible on the gross amount, not net, distinguishing prior case law concerning business profits. The claim for deduction on profits from seed sales under section 80P(2)(iv) was upheld as per earlier ITAT decisions, allowing a 20% attribution of indirect expenses. Regarding section 14A read with Rule 8D disallowance for expenses incurred to earn exempt income, the tribunal ruled that such provisions do not apply to expenses related to income deductible under Chapter VIA. Consequently, the ITAT ruled entirely in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to grant the claimed deductions and delete the section 14A disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
