Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC affirmed the dismissal of the writ petition, emphasizing the availability of statutory appellate remedies. Penalties totaling Rs. 2,00,000/- were imposed under Section 20 of the IGST Act read with Sections 129(1)(a) and 129(6) of the CGST Act, including a vehicle penalty for conveyance of goods. The vehicle was ordered released upon payment of Rs. 50,000/- and furnishing a bond for the balance. The perishable goods, detained but not seized, were to be sold at auction within 45 days, with proceeds held in an interest-bearing account pending the appellate authority's final decision. The appellants were permitted to participate in the auction and directed to file a statutory appeal within 15 days. The order balances the risk of vehicle deterioration and goods perishability while ensuring recovery of penalties and safeguarding appellants' rights through proper appellate channels. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
The HC affirmed the dismissal of the writ petition, emphasizing the availability of statutory appellate remedies. Penalties totaling Rs. 2,00,000/- were imposed under Section 20 of the IGST Act read with Sections 129(1)(a) and 129(6) of the CGST Act, including a vehicle penalty for conveyance of goods. The vehicle was ordered released upon payment of Rs. 50,000/- and furnishing a bond for the balance. The perishable goods, detained but not seized, were to be sold at auction within 45 days, with proceeds held in an interest-bearing account pending the appellate authority's final decision. The appellants were permitted to participate in the auction and directed to file a statutory appeal within 15 days. The order balances the risk of vehicle deterioration and goods perishability while ensuring recovery of penalties and safeguarding appellants' rights through proper appellate channels. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
