Limitation in customs appeals permits exclusion for bona fide refund proceedings, enabling restoration of Bill of Entry assessment challenges on merit...
Warehousing permission requires deposit at the designated bonded warehouse; unauthorised diversion triggers confiscation, redemption fine and importer...
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.