Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Abuse of dominant position allegations against an exchange found not prima facie; regulator reliance on sectoral expertise upheld and no investigation...
All appeals dismissed; finding of anti-competitive bid-rigging upheld under Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d) read with 3(1); cease-and-desist and total-turno...
HC dismissed writ petitions challenging CCI's jurisdiction over anti-competitive conduct allegations in telecom sector. Court held both Competition Act and TRAI Act are special legislation in respective fields with potential overlapping jurisdiction. CCI has exclusive authority to investigate misuse of dominant position under Section 4 of Competition Act, while TRAI handles license condition violations and regulatory compliance. When allegations involve dominant position abuse in relevant market, CCI maintains jurisdiction regardless of concurrent TRAI regulatory issues. Court ruled CCI competent to determine its own jurisdiction and declined to interfere with Section 26 proceedings at preliminary stage. Both sectoral regulators operate in distinct fields without jurisdictional conflict, with CCI serving as specialized regulator for anti-competitive practices investigation.
HC dismissed writ petitions challenging CCI's jurisdiction over anti-competitive conduct allegations in telecom sector. Court held both Competition Act and TRAI Act are special legislation in respective fields with potential overlapping jurisdiction. CCI has exclusive authority to investigate misuse of dominant position under Section 4 of Competition Act, while TRAI handles license condition violations and regulatory compliance. When allegations involve dominant position abuse in relevant market, CCI maintains jurisdiction regardless of concurrent TRAI regulatory issues. Court ruled CCI competent to determine its own jurisdiction and declined to interfere with Section 26 proceedings at preliminary stage. Both sectoral regulators operate in distinct fields without jurisdictional conflict, with CCI serving as specialized regulator for anti-competitive practices investigation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
