Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed petitioner's writ petitions challenging ED's investigation into alleged Rs. 600 crores money laundering involving IREO Group. Court held petitioner lacked locus standi under Article 226 as neither a homebuyer nor person aggrieved by corporate mismanagement. Petitions failed PIL requirements under Delhi HC PIL Rules 2010. Court refused court-monitored investigation, finding ED actively pursuing investigation at homebuyers' instance under Special Court PMLA Panchkula supervision with appropriate attachment orders issued. Petitioner failed to demonstrate ED inaction warranting judicial oversight. Court noted petitioner's suppression of material facts, misrepresentation of court orders, and false declarations regarding investor status constituted approaching court with unclean hands. All petitions dismissed for lack of locus standi and non-maintainability.
HC dismissed petitioner's writ petitions challenging ED's investigation into alleged Rs. 600 crores money laundering involving IREO Group. Court held petitioner lacked locus standi under Article 226 as neither a homebuyer nor person aggrieved by corporate mismanagement. Petitions failed PIL requirements under Delhi HC PIL Rules 2010. Court refused court-monitored investigation, finding ED actively pursuing investigation at homebuyers' instance under Special Court PMLA Panchkula supervision with appropriate attachment orders issued. Petitioner failed to demonstrate ED inaction warranting judicial oversight. Court noted petitioner's suppression of material facts, misrepresentation of court orders, and false declarations regarding investor status constituted approaching court with unclean hands. All petitions dismissed for lack of locus standi and non-maintainability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
