PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
