Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC granted bail to petitioner charged under Sections 132(l)(a), (e), (f) and (I) read with Section 132(l)(i), 132(iv)(5) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged tax evasion through sale of tyres and tubes below market value. Court considered petitioner's two-and-half months judicial custody since April 2025, filing of charge-sheet in May 2025, age-related health issues, and precedents including Vineet Jain. Court noted evidence would be primarily documentary and electronic with official witnesses, eliminating tampering concerns, and anticipated lengthy trial proceedings. Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to trial court satisfaction and imposed conditions under Section 483 BNSS.
HC granted bail to petitioner charged under Sections 132(l)(a), (e), (f) and (I) read with Section 132(l)(i), 132(iv)(5) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged tax evasion through sale of tyres and tubes below market value. Court considered petitioner's two-and-half months judicial custody since April 2025, filing of charge-sheet in May 2025, age-related health issues, and precedents including Vineet Jain. Court noted evidence would be primarily documentary and electronic with official witnesses, eliminating tampering concerns, and anticipated lengthy trial proceedings. Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to trial court satisfaction and imposed conditions under Section 483 BNSS.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
